I got into a rather lively debate with a (former) Twitter follower of mine.
She had seen the title of my post entitled “Newt Gingrich Owes African-Americans an Apology” and had taken issue. Her response to the tweet announcing the blog post was “no he doesn’t.” She said I was playing “the race card” and that “it doesn’t work.”
Later in the evening, she and I started an exchange. I said that Newt had played the race card by referring to President Obama as “the food stamp president.” Though statistics show that more whites than blacks receive food stamps, what many “hear” when they hear “food stamps” is “black people are getting food stamps” because they are lazy and do not want to work. It’s an underlying thought in this country, and, I argued, Newt knows that very well.
I said that Newt was playing to his base. I also, erroneously, said that he had earlier said that “poor black children” don’t have a work ethic,” and my friend quickly corrected me and said he had only said “poor children.” She was right and I admitted it as such.
But she was angry. She said I was racist and that I was calling HER racist for saying that Newt Gingrich was playing to his base. And she said that people like me are the ones who keep the races divided. She “unfollowed” me.
She is not the only one who would agree with me, and clearly, not every African-American would agree with me. Just this morning, CNN’s Soledad O’Brien and Roland Martin were talking about this very same thing with former GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain, who vehemently rejects the idea that there is such a thing as racially coded language.
But that’s all right. Back to my little encounter with my Twitter friend, I was sorry that she “unfollowed” me because I enjoyed tweeting with her. She and I obviously have different ways of seeing things, but that’s good; one learns from talking with people who are different.
But what bothers me is that she really thinks that there is no such thing as racially coded language. She accused me of “race baiting,” and if bringing up that Newt was playing the race card to appeal to his mostly white, South Carolina audience, then that’s what I was doing.
But it seems a bit naive to really believe that there is no such thing as racially coded language. It has always been done. President Reagan, the GOP iconic hero, did it when he used the phrase “welfare queen.” I am quite sure that the image that most people had, black and white, was that of a black woman with too many kids who refused to work but who kept having children so she could get more money from the government.
It is a despicable image, and an inaccurate one. Yes, there are people of all races who abuse the system, and yes, it is true that if one keeps getting hand-outs, he or she might be less inclined to look for work, but that doesn’t apply to everyone or even to the vast number of people who are on public assistance.
Rick Santorum, at least, was forthright in his comments which were not all that complimentary toward black people. He said, outright, that he didn’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money. I want to give them the opportunity to go out and make their own money…” (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/rick-santorum-entitlements-black-people_n_1181212.html)
It was a straight up statement; you didn’t have to guess about what he meant. He later tried to back out of it and said he didn’t say “black” people, but he did. He was standing on the long-held stated and believed myth, again, that “black people” are lazy, that “black people” are the ones who are using and abusing the welfare system. It was insulting, but the language was not racially coded.
Gingrich, on the other hand, did use coded language when he said that President Obama is the “food stamp president.” He was more honest when he said that the “African American community should demand pay checks and not food stamps.” It is still insulting; it is still a statement that upholds and supports a myth that black people are the ones driving the growth of “big government,” and that is just not true. You can read what Gingrich said at (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/05/newt-gingrich-paychecks-food-stamps_n_1188193.html).
I will probably never re-connect with my former Twitter friend – she won’t have it – but I cannot let this discussion slip into nothingness. She called me a racist for saying that Newt was and is playing the race card and for sticking to my guns. That’s rather like one who has been beaten being blamed for the beating. African-Americans, and many whites, have “been in the storm too long” not to recognize when they are being targeted for someone else’s gain.
Newt Gingrich is a master politician and a very smart man. Trust and believe that he knew what he was doing when he said President Obama is the “food stamp president” to that roomful of white people in South Carolina. If saying that makes me a racist, then so be it. The truth is the truth.
A candid observation…
6 thoughts on “Such Thing as Racially Coded Language?”
I don’t know if I have a strong opinion one way or the other on the issue of whether or not there is racially coded language, but the thing about Newt Gingrich’s comment about the “food stamp” president that makes me mad is that it implies that Obama is just encouraging people to abuse the system and get a free ride. It’s as if he’s saying, “If all the people on food stamps would just find a job, there would be no need for the food stamps.” I think that’s such a ridiculous thought process. For Newt Gingrich, making millions, sitting in a high political position, “finding a job” isn’t an issue and hasn’t been an issue for a long time. Newt Gingrich (and others who think like him) undermine the hard work that so many Americans have been doing and continue to do with no success. I’d like for Newt to come spend just a week in the shoes of the family who was forced to start buying food stamps because the husband just lost his job of 20 years, or the mother who has to choose between buying medicine for herself or food for her children, and again, has to resort to food stamps just to get by. Newt has no idea what it’s like, and it’s such an offensive statement.
You are right on on this one!
He was called the “food stamp president” because the food stamp rolls have tripled since he has been our president and there are efforts by the government to expand the food stamp and welfare programs. Conservatives want people (all people) to have the opportunity for work and to make a living and care for themselves and their loved ones. It is hard to do that when the economy is so depressed by the financial failing of our government. That was his point.
Yeah, but wasn’t the reason for the increase in people using food stamps because the economy had tanked, something which the Bush administration ushered in? Scores and scores of people were losing their jobs, and their houses. There weren’t any jobs! People who had been middle class were suddenly homeless. If they had not had access to food stamps, and they had no money, how would they and their families survived? Just wondering …